80年代土耳其译制电影,80年代外国电影|80年代外国电影有哪些_80年代外国经典电影在线播放地址是多少？

[1]胡穎峰,王艷,張嶸,等.兩種不同設計原理的景深延長型人工晶體術后視覺效果比較[J].福建醫(yī)藥雜志,2025,47(04):1-6.[doi:10.20148/j.fmj.2025.04.001]
　HU Yingfeng,WANG Yan,ZHANG Rong,et al.Comparative study on postoperative visual outcomes of two types of extended depth of focus intraocular lenses based on different design principles[J].FUJIAN MEDICAL JOURNAL,2025,47(04):1-6.[doi:10.20148/j.fmj.2025.04.001]
點擊復制

兩種不同設計原理的景深延長型人工晶體術后視覺效果比較()
分享到：

《福建醫(yī)藥雜志》[ISSN:1002-2600/CN:35-1071/R]

卷:
47
期數(shù):
2025年04期
頁碼:
1-6
欄目:
臨床研究
出版日期:
2025-04-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
Comparative study on postoperative visual outcomes of two types of extended depth of focus intraocular lenses based on different design principles
文章編號:
1002-2600(2025)04-0001-06
作者:
胡穎峰1; 王艷1; 張嶸1; 王崢1; 葉向彧1; 2
1 福建省福州眼科醫(yī)院,福州 350007; 2 廈門大學附屬廈門眼科中心,廈門 361000
Author(s):
HU Yingfeng1;  WANG Yan1;  ZHANG Rong1;  WANG Zheng1;  YE Xiangyu1; 2
1Fuzhou Eye Hospital, Fujian Province, Fuzhou, Fujian 350007, China; 2Xiamen Eye Center, Xiamen University, Xiamen, Fujian 361000, China
關鍵詞:
ZXR00;  DFT015;  景深延長;  離焦范圍;  近附加屈光力
Keywords:
ZXR00;  DFT015;  extended depth of focus;  defocus range;  near addition power
分類號:
R776.1
DOI:
10.20148/j.fmj.2025.04.001
文獻標志碼:
B
摘要:
目的 比較ZXR00與DFT015這兩種不同設計原理的人工晶狀體的實際臨床效果。方法 本研究為回顧性研究,納入2023年1月至2024年1月期間在福州眼科醫(yī)院行白內障超聲乳化摘除術的患者71例。術后3個月,比較兩組患者的裸眼5 m距離遠視力(UDVA)、66 cm中視力(UIVA)、40 cm近視力(UNVA)及遠距離最佳矯正后的遠視力(CDVA)、中視力(DCIVA)、近視力(DCNVA); 通過離焦曲線比較兩組的離焦范圍即近附加屈光力,并借助VF-14視覺質量量表、QoV調查問卷以及光學質量分析系統(tǒng)評估視覺質量。結果 術后3個月,兩組UDVA、CDVA、UIVA、DCIVA均表現(xiàn)出較好的視力,且組間差異無統(tǒng)計學意義; ZXR00組UNVA平均值略高于DFT015組,但差異無統(tǒng)計學意義。DFT015組斯特列爾比(SR)值高于ZXR00組,差異有統(tǒng)計學意義(P<0.05); 離焦曲線結果顯示,ZXR00組離焦范圍略大于DFT015組。調制傳遞函數(shù)(MTF)曲線顯示DFT015組略優(yōu)于ZXR00組。結論 ZXR00與DFT015人工晶體術后均能獲得良好的遠、中視力。ZXR00人工晶體在近視力、離焦范圍等方面表現(xiàn)略優(yōu),而DFT015組在術后光學性能及視覺穩(wěn)定性等方面更具優(yōu)勢。
Abstract:
Objective This study aims to compare the clinical efficacy of two kinds of intraocular lenses(IOLs)with distinct design principles: ZXR00 and DFT015.Methods This retrospective analysis encompassed 71 patients who underwent cataract phacoemulsification surgery at Fuzhou Eye Hospital from January 2023 to January 2024.Three months postoperatively, the uncorrected distance visual acuity at 5 meters(UDVA), intermediate visual acuity at 66 centimeters(UIVA), and near visual acuity at 40 centimeters(UNVA), as well as the best-corrected distance visual acuity(CDVA), intermediate visual acuity(DCIVA), and near visual acuity(DCNVA)between the two groups were evaluated and compared.Additionally, the defocus range, specifically the near addition refractive power was assessed using defocus curves.Visual quality was evaluated through the VF-14 visual quality scale, the QoV questionnaire, and an optical quality analysis system.Results Three months after surgery, both groups exhibited good vision for UDVA, CDVA, UIVA, and DCIVA, with no statistically significant differences between the groups.The average UNVA in the ZXR00 group was slightly higher than that in the DFT015 group, although this difference was not statistically significant.The strehl ratio(SR)of the DFT015 group was statistically significantly higher than that of the ZXR00 group.Defocus curve results indicated that the defocus range in the ZXR00 group was slightly larger than that in the DFT015 group.The modulation transfer function(MTF)curve showed that the DFT015 group was slightly superior to the ZXR00 group.Conclusion Both ZXR00 and DFT015 intraocular lenses achieve good distance and intermediate vision postoperatively.The ZXR00 lens demonstrates slightly better performance in terms of near vision and defocus range, while the DFT015 lens showes advantages in optical performance and visual stability after surgery.

參考文獻/References:

[1] Chiam P J T, Chan J H, Aggarwal R K, et al.ReSTOR intraocular lens implantation in cataract surgery: quality of vision [J].Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, 2006, 32(9): 1459-1463.
[2] Gil M A, Varon C, Rosello N, et al.Visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, subjective quality of vision, and quality of life with 4 different multifocal IOLs [J].Eur J Ophthalmol, 2012, 22(2): 175-187.
[3] Chang J S, Ng J C, Chan V K, et al.Visual outcomes, quality of vision, and quality of life of diffractive multifocal intraocular lens implantation after myopic laser in situ keratomileusis: a prospective, observational case series [J].J Ophthalmol, 2017, 2017: 6459504.
[4] Schallhorn J M, Pantanelli S M, Lin C C, et al.Multifocal and accommodating intraocular lenses for the treatment of presbyopia: a report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology [J].Ophthalmology, 2021, 128(10): 1469-1482.
[5] Do owiec-Kwapisz A, Piotrowska H, Misiuk-Hoj o M.Evaluation of visual and patient-reported outcomes, spectacle dependence after bilateral implantation with a non-diffractive extended depth of focus intraocular lens compared to other intraocular lenses [J].J Clin Med, 2022, 11(17):5246.
[6] Sánchez-González J M, Sánchez-González M C, De-Hita-Cantalejo C, et al.Small aperture IC-8 extended-depth-of-focus intraocular lens in cataract surgery: a systematic review [J].J Clin Med, 2022, 11(16):4654.
[7] Kohnen T, Suryakumar R.Extended depth-of-focus technology in intraocular lenses [J].J Cataract Refract Surg, 2020, 46(2): 298-304.
[8] Coassin M, Mori T, Di Zazzo A, et al.Effect of minimonovi-sion in bilateral implantation of a novel non-diffractive extended depth-of-focus intraocular lens: defocus curves, visual outcomes, and quality of life [J].Eur J Ophthalmol, 2022, 32(5): 2942-2948.
[9] Kohnen T, Berdahl J P, Hong X, et al.The novel optical design and clinical classification of a wavefront-shaping presbyopia-correcting intraocular lens [J].Clin Ophthalmol, 2023, 17: 2449-2457.
[10] Chang D H, Janakiraman D P, Smith P J, et al.Visual outcomes and safety of an extended depth-of-focus intraocular lens: results of a pivotal clinical trial [J].J Cataract Refract Surg, 2022, 48(3): 288-297.
[11] Kim S, Yi R, Chung S H.Comparative analysis of the clinical outcomes of mix-and-match implantation of an extended depth-of-focus and a diffractive bifocal intraocular lens [J].Eye Contact Lens, 2022, 48(6): 261-266.
[12] Kohnen T, Petermann K, Böhm M, et al.Nondiffractive wavefront-shaping extended depth-of-focus intraocular lens: visual performance and patient-reported outcomes [J].J Cataract Refract Surg, 2022, 48(2): 144-150.
[13] Rementería-Capelo L A, Lorente P, Carrillo V, et al.Patient satisfaction and visual performance in patients with ocular pathology after bilateral implantation of a new extended depth of focus intraocular lens [J].J Ophthalmol, 2022, 2022: 4659309.
[14] Sabur H, Unsal U.Visual outcomes of non-diffractive extended-depth-of-focus and enhanced monofocal intraocular lenses: a case-control study [J].Eur J Ophthalmol, 2023, 33(1): 262-268.
[15] Kohnen T, Böhm M, Hemkeppler E, et al.Visual performance of an extended depth of focus intraocular lens for treatment selection [J].Eye(Lond), 2019, 33(10): 1556-1563.
[16] Son H S, Kim S H, Auffarth G U, et al.Prospective comparative study of tolerance to refractive errors after implantation of extended depth of focus and monofocal intraocular lenses with identical aspheric platform in Korean population [J].BMC Ophthalmol, 2019, 19(1): 187.
[17] Cheng A M S, Yin H Y, Davenport C, et al.Clinical outcome of diffractive multifocal lens versus monofocal lens in post-laser in situ keratomileusis patients: a retrospective, comparative study [J].Indian J Ophthalmol, 2023, 71(3): 779-783.
[18] Wu T, Wang Y, Yu J, et al.Comparison of dynamic defocus curve on cataract patients implanting extended depth of focus and monofocal intraocular lens [J].Eye Vis(Lond), 2023, 10(1): 5.
[19] Giannuzzi F, Carlà M M, Margollicci F, et al.Functional outcomes and quality of life after AcrySof IQ Vivity intraocular lens implantation in a real-world study [J].Sci Rep, 2024, 14(1): 20620.
[20] Arrigo A, Gambaro G, Fasce F, et al.Extended depth-of-focus(EDOF)AcrySof IQ Vivity intraocular lens implant: a real-life experience [J].Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol, 2021, 259(9): 2717-2722.
[21] Black S.A clinical assessment of visual performance of combining the TECNIS Symfony Extended Range of Vision IOL(ZXR00)with the +3.25 D TECNIS Multifocal 1-piece IOL(ZLB00)in subjects undergoing bilateral cataract extraction [J].Clin Ophthalmol, 2018, 12: 2129-2136.
[22] Lubiński W, Podboraczyńska-Jodko K, Kirkiewicz M, et al.Comparison of visual outcomes after implantation of AtLisa tri 839 MP and Symfony intraocular lenses [J].Int Ophthalmol, 2020, 40(10): 2553-2562.
[23] Schallhorn J M.Multifocal and extended depth of focus intraocular lenses: a comparison of data from the united states food and drug administration premarket approval trials [J].J Refract Surg, 2021, 37(2): 98-104.
[24] Breyer D R H, Beckers L, Ax T, et al.Current review: multifocal intraocular lenses and extended depth of focus intraocular lenses [J].Klin Monbl Augenheilkd, 2020, 237(8): 943-957.
[25] Tran D B, Owyang A, Hwang J, et al.Visual acuity, quality of vision, and patient-reported outcomes after bilateral implantation with a trifocal or extended depth of focus intraocular lens [J].Clin Ophthalmol, 2021, 15: 403-412.
[26] Hovanesian J A, Jones M, Allen Q.The vivity extended range of Vision IOL vs the PanOptix Trifocal, ReStor 2.5 Active Focus and ReStor 3.0 Multifocal Lenses: a comparison of patient satisfaction, visual disturbances, and spectacle independence [J].Clin Ophthalmol, 2022, 16: 145-152.
[27] Kim J H, Eom Y, Park S Y, et al.Rainbow halos occur less following implantation of extended range of vision one-piece intraocular lenses vs diffractive bifocal intraocular lenses [J].Int J Ophthalmol, 2020, 13(6): 913-919.
[28] Jeon Y J, Yoon Y, Kim T I, et al.Comparison between an intraocular lens with extended depth of focus(Tecnis Symfony ZXR00)and a new monofocal intraocular lens with enhanced intermediate vision(Tecnis Eyhance ICB00)[J].Asia Pac J Ophthalmol(Phila), 2021, 10(6): 542-547.
[29] Song M Y, Kang K H, Lee H, et al.A comparative study of two extended depth of focus intraocular lenses [J].Eye Contact Lens, 2022, 48(10): 433-438.
[30] Guarro M, Sararols L, Londoño G J, et al.Visual disturbances produced after the implantation of 3 EDOF intraocular lenses vs 1 monofocal intraocular lens [J].J Cataract Refract Surg, 2022, 48(12): 1354-1359.

備注/Memo

備注/Memo:
基金項目:福州市科技計劃項目(2022-S-013)
通信作者:葉向彧,Email:[email protected]
更新日期/Last Update: 2025-04-20