80年代土耳其译制电影,80年代外国电影|80年代外国电影有哪些_80年代外国经典电影在线播放地址是多少?

[1]陳品華 何武兵.撬撥復(fù)位經(jīng)皮螺釘內(nèi)固定治療跟骨骨折的療效分析[J].福建醫(yī)藥雜志,2020,42(05):29-31.
點擊復(fù)制

撬撥復(fù)位經(jīng)皮螺釘內(nèi)固定治療跟骨骨折的療效分析()
分享到:

《福建醫(yī)藥雜志》[ISSN:1002-2600/CN:35-1071/R]

卷:
42
期數(shù):
2020年05期
頁碼:
29-31
欄目:
臨床研究
出版日期:
2020-10-20

文章信息/Info

文章編號:
1002-2600(2020)05-0029-04
作者:
陳品華 何武兵1
福建醫(yī)科大學(xué)省立臨床醫(yī)學(xué)院 福建省立醫(yī)院急診外科(福州 350001)
關(guān)鍵詞:
跟骨骨折 內(nèi)固定 微創(chuàng) 療效
分類號:
R683.42
文獻標志碼:
B
摘要:
目的 比較撬撥復(fù)位經(jīng)皮螺釘內(nèi)固定與切開復(fù)位鋼板內(nèi)固定治療Sanders Ⅲ型跟骨骨折的臨床療效。方法 回顧性收集我院2015年1月至2018年9月收治的71例Sanders Ⅲ型跟骨骨折病例,根據(jù)不同的手術(shù)方案分為撬撥復(fù)位經(jīng)皮螺釘內(nèi)固定組(MIRPF組,35例)和切開復(fù)位鋼板內(nèi)固定組(ORIF組,36例)。比較兩組術(shù)前準備時間、手術(shù)時間、術(shù)后切口感染率、術(shù)后1年跟骨X線參數(shù)及AOFAS(美國足踝外科協(xié)會)踝-后足評分。結(jié)果 MIRPF組術(shù)前準備時間、手術(shù)時間均小于ORIF組(P<0.05); MIRPF組術(shù)后切口感染率低于ORIF組,但兩組差異無統(tǒng)計學(xué)意義(P>0.05); 術(shù)后1年X線參數(shù)、AOFAS踝-后足評分比較,兩組差異均無統(tǒng)計學(xué)意義(P>0.05)。結(jié)論 撬撥復(fù)位經(jīng)皮螺釘內(nèi)固定治療Sanders Ⅲ型跟骨骨折療效較好,安全可靠。

參考文獻/References:

[1] 俞光榮,燕曉宇.跟骨骨折治療方法的選擇[J].中華骨科雜志,2006,26(2):134-141.
[2] Xia S L,Lu Y G,Wang H Z,et al.Open reduction and internal fixation with conventional plate via L-shaped lateral approach versus internal fixation with percutaneous plate via a sinus tarsi approach for calcaneal fractures-A randomized controlled trial[J].International Journal of Surgery,2014,12(5):475-480.
[3] Sharr P J,Mangupli M M,Winson I G,et al.Current management options for displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures: Non-operative, ORIF, minimally invasive reduction and fixation or primary ORIF and subtalar arthrodesis.A contemporary review[J].Foot and Ankle Surgery,2016,22(1):1-8.
[4] Wei N,Yuwen P Z,Liu W,et al.Operative versus nonoperative treatment of displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures:A meta-analysis of current evidence base[J].Medicine,2017, 96(49):1-8.
[5] Agren P H,Wretenberg P,Sayed-Noor A S,et al.Operative versus nonoperative treatment of displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures: a prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter trial[J].J Bone Joint Surg Am,2013,95(15):1351-1357.
[6] Abdelazeem A,Khedr A,Abousayed M,et al.Management of displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures using the limited open sinus tarsi approach and fixation by screws only technique[J].International Orthopaedics(SICOT),2014,38(3):601-606.
[7] Bacaksiz T,Kazimoglu C,Reisoglu A,et al.Optimum screw configuration for the fixation of Sanders type IIC tongue-type fractures?A biomechanical study[J].Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association,2018,108(1):20-26.
[8] Battaglia A,Catania P,Gumina S,et al.Early minimally invasive percutaneous fixation of displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures with a percutaneous angle stable device[J].The Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery,2015,54(1):51-56.
[9] Kumar V S,Marimuthu K,Subramani S,et al.Prospective randomized trial comparing open reduction and internal fixation with minimally invasive reduction and percutaneous fixation in managing displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures[J].International Orthopaedics(SICOT),2014,38(12):2505-2512.
[10] Majeed H,Barrie J,Munro W,et al.Minimally invasive reduction and percutaneous fixation versus open reduction and internal fixation for displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures: a systematic review of the literature[J].EFORT Open Rev,2018,3(7):418-425.
[11] Peng Y,Liu J H,Zhang G Z,et al.Reduction and functional outcome of open reduction plate fixation versus minimally invasive reduction with percutaneous screw fixation for displaced calcaneus fracture: a retrospective study[J].Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research,2019,14(1):1-9.

更新日期/Last Update: 2020-10-20